← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Hudson Oaks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 35. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
35
detected
3,487
people served
22
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Parker

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
70
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0150 µg/L 5/12 2024
PFBS 0.0073 µg/L 3/12 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1810 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
538.9 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
64/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
15.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
54/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
52/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
35/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
16.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
34/63 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
53.3 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
27/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.2 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
25/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
24/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
4.7 pCi/L 94%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
20/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1270 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
429 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
14/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
130 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
7.7 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
5.7 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
14 pCi/L 93%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2024
Lithium
36.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/12 UCMR-5 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.4 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
26.5 µg/L 442%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 6 µg/L
3/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
2.2 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Thallium, Total
0.0250 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
2/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.2000 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.9400 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
25 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Picloram
0.1170 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 500 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2014–2019
Xylenes, Total
6.7 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
74 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FITZPATRICK, TOM
Phone
682-229-2400
Email
info@hudsonoaks.com

Frequently asked questions about City of Hudson Oaks

Is City of Hudson Oaks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 35 contaminants in City of Hudson Oaks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Hudson Oaks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Hudson Oaks serve?

City of Hudson Oaks reports serving 3,487 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Hudson Oaks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 70 violations on file for City of Hudson Oaks, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.