Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 63.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 35.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 111 µg/L 139% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 40.2 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 30.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 49/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 16.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 47/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 450 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 27/29 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 17/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 14 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 8/29 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sturdivant Progress Wsc
Is Sturdivant Progress Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sturdivant Progress Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sturdivant Progress Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sturdivant Progress Wsc serve?
Sturdivant Progress Wsc reports serving 3,111 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Sturdivant Progress Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 74 violations on file for Sturdivant Progress Wsc, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.