Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

North Rural Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
3,610
people served
4
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Palo Pinto

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
32
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-15
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-15
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
60.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
32.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
104 µg/L 130%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
38.4 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
27.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 65/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
29.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 64/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
46.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 56/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
6.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 56/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 42/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
191.8 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 18/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 18/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2022
Lead
19.3 µg/L 129%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 7/20 SYR4 2016–2019

Utility contact

Contact
BRAZZEL, BOBBY
Phone
940-327-0700

Frequently asked questions about North Rural Wsc

Is North Rural Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in North Rural Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in North Rural Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does North Rural Wsc serve?

North Rural Wsc reports serving 3,610 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has North Rural Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 32 violations on file for North Rural Wsc, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.