← Texas

Tap water quality report

Violet Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
2,670
people served
21
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nueces

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

21
health-based violations
97
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
358 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 830 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2017–2018
Bromodichloromethane
23.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.3 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.4 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
67.58 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 122 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.34 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
21.605 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
30/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
17.5 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
16/50 SYR4 2017–2018
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2026
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
8/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
12.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L
6/32 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
MORRIS, SAM
Phone
361-387-1042
Email
violetwater@aol.com

Frequently asked questions about Violet Wsc

Is Violet Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Violet Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Violet Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Violet Wsc serve?

Violet Wsc reports serving 2,670 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Violet Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 97 violations on file for Violet Wsc, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.