← Texas

Tap water quality report

Emerald Lakes Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
18
detected
1,053
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
13
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-02-10
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-02-10
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-09-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-09-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
150 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
26/28 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
16 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
14/28 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate
40 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.4 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
288 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
4.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.4 pCi/L 68%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
6.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
140 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
8.6 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
8.2 pCi/L 55%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2023
Bromoform
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
1.9 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
3/16 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
16.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
1.6 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
10 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2014
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DEGEYTER, DEANNA
Phone
936-756-7400
Email
deanna@twwaterservice.com

Frequently asked questions about Emerald Lakes Subdivision

Is Emerald Lakes Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Emerald Lakes Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Emerald Lakes Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Emerald Lakes Subdivision serve?

Emerald Lakes Subdivision reports serving 1,053 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Emerald Lakes Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for Emerald Lakes Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.