Compliance record
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on
record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation.
Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 921 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 91/95 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 71.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 94.2 µg/L 118% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 40/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 39/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 51 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 39/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 37/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 35/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 210 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 30/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 4.41 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 20/95 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00081 mg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 247 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 200 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Fluoride | 140 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 11.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3 pCi/L 60% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dalapon | 1.4 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.4 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rayford Road Mud
Is Rayford Road Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Rayford Road Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rayford Road Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rayford Road Mud serve?
Rayford Road Mud reports serving 11,550 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Rayford Road Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Rayford Road Mud.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.