Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 127 µg/L 9.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 8 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 17/31 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate | 60 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 13 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0034 mg/L 23% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 42.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 76 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.6 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 24.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 215 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 540 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.8 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Oak Ridge North
Is City of Oak Ridge North tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in City of Oak Ridge North's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Oak Ridge North's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Oak Ridge North serve?
City of Oak Ridge North reports serving 3,585 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Oak Ridge North had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for City of Oak Ridge North, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.