← Texas

Tap water quality report

Marlow Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
19
detected
705
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Milam

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
27
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
110 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2017
Bromoform
11.2045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
70 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
8/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
18.4 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.81 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2023
Lead
13.4 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
6/26 SYR4 2016–2017
Chloroform
1.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
4/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
236 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
1.32 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
120.6 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 121 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Selenium
21.935 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Arsenic
7.2 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Dichloroacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NOKER, MICHAEL
Phone
254-697-4016

Frequently asked questions about Marlow Wsc

Is Marlow Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Marlow Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Marlow Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Marlow Wsc serve?

Marlow Wsc reports serving 705 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Marlow Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Marlow Wsc, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.