Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Pine Harbor Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
24
detected
1,314
people served
34
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Marion

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

34
health-based violations
48
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
83.5 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 20/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
96.25 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
18/24 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
25.54 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L
12/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.34 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.52 µg/L
11/24 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
10/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
199.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 199.6 µg/L
8/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
14.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
8/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
7/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
5.5475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.87 µg/L
6/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L
6/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
24.005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.76 µg/L
6/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
41.4 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.5 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
998.8 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
31.2 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L
5/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.22 pCi/L 44%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.3 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
63.35 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
3/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
39.665 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
39.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
1.99 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
5.28 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
8.09 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARRY, CHUCK
Phone
737-376-2534
Email
chuck.barry@nexuswg.com

Frequently asked questions about Pine Harbor Subdivision

Is Pine Harbor Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Pine Harbor Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pine Harbor Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pine Harbor Subdivision serve?

Pine Harbor Subdivision reports serving 1,314 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Pine Harbor Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for Pine Harbor Subdivision, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.