Is Town North Estates Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Lubbock

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1,036

health-based violations

1,435

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Addressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	7924.5 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 8080 µg/L	64/64	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	16.67 µg/L 167% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L	32/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	4987 µg/L 125% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 5550 µg/L	32/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	33.515 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 33.9 pCi/L	32/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Uranium	39.7 µg/L 132% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L worst single sample: 59.9 µg/L	31/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	13.585 pCi/L 91% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 16 pCi/L	28/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Selenium	53.06 µg/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 50 µg/L worst single sample: 56 µg/L	25/25	SYR4	2012–2018
Copper	114.75 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 210 µg/L	16/17	SYR4	2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite	7982.5 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 8080 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2012–2015
Bromoform	8.8005 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.42 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	8/8	LCR	2025
Lead	3.985 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 4 µg/L	4/17	SYR4	2012–2017
Barium	33.01 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	3.36 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	7.228 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 7.65 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	25.26 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.6765 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.76 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Chromium	2.2 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid	25.9 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019

59 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BREWER, STANLEY
Phone: 806-790-9866
Email: stanbrewer1967@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Town North Estates

Is Town North Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Town North Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Town North Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Arsenic, Fluoride, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Town North Estates serve?

Town North Estates reports serving 216 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Town North Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1435 violations on file for Town North Estates, of which 1036 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 16 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.