Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-11-01 → 2011-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-11-01 → 2011-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-11-01 → 2011-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-11-01 → 2011-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0134 µg/L | 3/8 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 23.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 33.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 31 µg/L No EPA limit set | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18 µg/L No EPA limit set | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 82.7 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.8 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 2500 µg/L 192% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 38/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 35/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 11.9 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 10 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 170 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.7 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 19/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0018 mg/L 12% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 130 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 290 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 7.1 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 32.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Cyanide | 140 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 170 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.5400 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 0.3430 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 14.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Three Rivers
Is City of Three Rivers tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in City of Three Rivers's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Three Rivers's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Three Rivers serve?
City of Three Rivers reports serving 4,428 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Three Rivers had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 126 violations on file for City of Three Rivers, of which 89 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.