Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0058 µg/L | 2/3 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 491 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 666 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.6 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.515 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.2 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 53.235 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.7 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.755 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.6 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.1625 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.49 µg/L | 46/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 31/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 18/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 15.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 14/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 8/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rose Hill Sud
Is Rose Hill Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Rose Hill Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rose Hill Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rose Hill Sud serve?
Rose Hill Sud reports serving 4,827 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Rose Hill Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Rose Hill Sud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.