Is Ericksdahl Wsc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Jones

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

160

health-based violations

245

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Unaddressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Unaddressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	65.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	179.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	99.9 µg/L No EPA limit set	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	143 µg/L No EPA limit set	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	45.2 µg/L No EPA limit set	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	370 µg/L 463% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	145 µg/L 242% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	37.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	56/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	14.6 µg/L No EPA limit set	54/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	17.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	50/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	2160 µg/L 166% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L	25/25	SYR4	2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	21.7 µg/L No EPA limit set	25/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	7.7 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	19/25	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	0.0034 mg/L 23% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	11/11	LCR	2025

Utility contact

Contact: RICHARDS, ERICK
Phone: 940-399-7020
Email: ericksdahlwatersupply@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Ericksdahl Wsc

Is Ericksdahl Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Ericksdahl Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ericksdahl Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ericksdahl Wsc serve?

Ericksdahl Wsc reports serving 275 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Ericksdahl Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 245 violations on file for Ericksdahl Wsc, of which 160 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.