← Texas

Tap water quality report

Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
15
detected
60
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Johnson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
9
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-04-02
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-05-01
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
60 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
57.56 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.4 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
5.981 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.05 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.44 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
1.1216 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
5/17 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
3.2 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
5.954 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
990.8 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
58.85 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Bromodichloromethane
1.038 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.04 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.00090 mg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2024
TTHM
10.4055 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DYCHE, JAMES, A
Phone
817-645-5493
Email
MLDYCHE@GMAIL.COM

Frequently asked questions about Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision

Is Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision serve?

Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision reports serving 60 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Oakridge Mobile Home Subdivision, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.