Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 72.5 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 19.555 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 3.796 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.97 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.641 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.92 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Barium | 5.88 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1379 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 71.75 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Chromium | 4.873 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 58.1735 µg/L 388% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.2 µg/L | 2/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 9.593 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.69 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.3200 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.18 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Woodland Oaks Estates
Is Woodland Oaks Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Woodland Oaks Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Woodland Oaks Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Woodland Oaks Estates serve?
Woodland Oaks Estates reports serving 189 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Woodland Oaks Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 17 violations on file for Woodland Oaks Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.