Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1991-06-01 → 1991-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-12-19 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 940 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 95/98 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 28.9 µg/L 193% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 34/98 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Chloroform | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 5.7 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 27/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.5 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 21/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00083 mg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2026 |
| Barium | 45.8 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 940 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 16 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.9 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 3/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.4 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 10 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 10 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Jasper
Is City of Jasper tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in City of Jasper's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Jasper's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Jasper serve?
City of Jasper reports serving 9,884 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Jasper had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 25 violations on file for City of Jasper, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.