← Texas

Tap water quality report

Holiday Estates Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
18
detected
231
people served
48
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Hunt

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

48
health-based violations
56
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0072 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0036 µg/L 1/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0037 µg/L 1/4 2024
PFOS 0.0040 µg/L 1/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0031 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
13.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
84.575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 102 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
70.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89.7 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
96.89 µg/L 121%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 113 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
141.35 µg/L 236%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
63.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86.6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
705 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L
16/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
15/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
13.615 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
14/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2023
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.703 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.77 µg/L
3/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
26 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
FOLTZ, SCOT, W
Phone
512-990-4400
Email
swfoltz@aquaamerica.com

Frequently asked questions about Holiday Estates Water

Is Holiday Estates Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Holiday Estates Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Holiday Estates Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Holiday Estates Water serve?

Holiday Estates Water reports serving 231 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Holiday Estates Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 56 violations on file for Holiday Estates Water, of which 48 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.