Is The Consolidated Wsc Rural Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Houston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-02
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-02
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-02
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-02
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	352.4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 470 µg/L	59/61	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	45.9 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	14/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	11.84 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	11.44 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	9.963 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L	12/13	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	1.66 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L	9/61	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	6.57 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	34.25 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 34.7 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	13.08 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	3.77 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Lithium	25.4 µg/L No EPA limit set	6/20	UCMR-5	2025
Lead	0.00075 mg/L 5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	5/5	LCR	2025
Bromoform	1.423 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.47 µg/L	3/13	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.56 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	3/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	327 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 330 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite	45.46 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	7.195 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2015–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.475 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L	2/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Cyanide	21.4 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/7	SYR4	2013–2019

88 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: STOKES, GENE
Phone: 936-544-2986

Frequently asked questions about The Consolidated Wsc Rural

Is The Consolidated Wsc Rural tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in The Consolidated Wsc Rural's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in The Consolidated Wsc Rural's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does The Consolidated Wsc Rural serve?

The Consolidated Wsc Rural reports serving 10,481 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has The Consolidated Wsc Rural had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 28 violations on file for The Consolidated Wsc Rural, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.