Is Shady Grove No 2 Wsc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Hopkins

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

116

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-02
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-02
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-07-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-04-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-04-01
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	204.75 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 239 µg/L	70/91	SYR4	2017–2019
Bromodichloromethane	19.15 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	28.29 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 41.3 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	24.35 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 28.8 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	55.31 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 56.8 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	43.7 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 50.1 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	15.55 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 21.3 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	6.683 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L	23/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	5.585 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L	12/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	4.905 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L	10/27	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	2.0426 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 2.54 µg/L	7/91	SYR4	2017–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	5/5	LCR	2024
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.085 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L	4/27	SYR4	2012–2019

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact: ANDERSON, MORGAN
Phone: 903-885-9254

Frequently asked questions about Shady Grove No 2 Wsc

Is Shady Grove No 2 Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Shady Grove No 2 Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shady Grove No 2 Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shady Grove No 2 Wsc serve?

Shady Grove No 2 Wsc reports serving 783 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Shady Grove No 2 Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 116 violations on file for Shady Grove No 2 Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.