Is North Hopkins Wsc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Hopkins

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	20.425 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	34.62 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 57.4 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	58.26 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 75.6 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	21.4 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 23.5 µg/L	56/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	38.55 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 44 µg/L	56/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	15.6 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L	55/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	6.535 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.93 µg/L	54/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	371.5 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 510 µg/L	43/60	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5 µg/L	26/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.51 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	19/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	13/13	LCR	2025
Monobromoacetic Acid	2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set	9/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	1.588 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L	4/60	SYR4	2013–2019

31 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: ASKINS, CHARLES
Phone: 903-945-2019

Frequently asked questions about North Hopkins Wsc

Is North Hopkins Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in North Hopkins Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in North Hopkins Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does North Hopkins Wsc serve?

North Hopkins Wsc reports serving 8,253 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has North Hopkins Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for North Hopkins Wsc, of which 27 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.