Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-09-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 421.45 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 679 µg/L | 38/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 697 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 941 µg/L | 35/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 34/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L | 31/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.4 µg/L | 30/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 52.12 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.2 µg/L | 29/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 25.64 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 25/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 18/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.9 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 16/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 16/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 13/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 2.146 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.31 µg/L | 5/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 5/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 309.6 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 376 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 17.51 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 197.35 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 199 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 0.7119 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 9.6 µg/L 160% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Brinker Wsc
Is Brinker Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Brinker Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Brinker Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Brinker Wsc serve?
Brinker Wsc reports serving 3,519 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Brinker Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 26 violations on file for Brinker Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.