← Texas

Tap water quality report

East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
21
detected
14,823
people served
135
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Henderson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

135
health-based violations
164
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-01-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0271 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfhps 0.0049 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
55.77 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.1 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.3415 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
114/115 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
77.84 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86 µg/L
107/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61.04 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.7 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
38.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L
106/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L
106/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
236.4 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 590 µg/L
85/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
58/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
41/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.558 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
18/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
385 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Barium
57.19 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1047.2 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1160 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.925 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
6/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.9001 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
1.894 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.92 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Atrazine
0.1000 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WILLI, JIM
Phone
903-887-7103

Frequently asked questions about East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire

Is East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire serve?

East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire reports serving 14,823 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 164 violations on file for East Cedar Creek Fwsd Brookshire, of which 135 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.