Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 112.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 142 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 33.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.4 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 137.5 µg/L 172% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 174 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 76.25 µg/L 127% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 122 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 32.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.9 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 30.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.5 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.3 µg/L | 20/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 11/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 365.6 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 570 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 6/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 4/4 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 15.6 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cedarview Estates
Is Cedarview Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Cedarview Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cedarview Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cedarview Estates serve?
Cedarview Estates reports serving 228 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Cedarview Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 457 violations on file for Cedarview Estates, of which 66 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.