Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Carolynn Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
28
detected
3,906
people served
58
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Henderson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

58
health-based violations
78
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0070 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFBS 0.0031 µg/L 1/4 2023
PFHXS 0.0039 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
344.8 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 547 µg/L
69/75 SYR4 2013–2017
Chloroform
80.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 88.6 µg/L
65/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
34.815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
64/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.12 µg/L
61/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
117 µg/L 146%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 126.8 µg/L
57/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
62.04 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.7 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
27.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.8 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
10.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
32/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
10.132 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
29/75 SYR4 2013–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
17/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
355 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
56.67 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
151 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.1000 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
 5/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
82.94 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.6 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
2.525 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.63 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.3 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Nitrite
10.5 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Thallium, Total
0.2560 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
2.43 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARRY, CHUCK
Phone
737-376-2534
Email
chuck.barry@nexuswg.com

Frequently asked questions about Carolynn Estates

Is Carolynn Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Carolynn Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Carolynn Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Carolynn Estates serve?

Carolynn Estates reports serving 3,906 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Carolynn Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 78 violations on file for Carolynn Estates, of which 58 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.