Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
25
detected
6,753
people served
68
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Henderson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

68
health-based violations
96
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-02-01 → 2011-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-02-01 → 2011-02-28

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0057 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
20.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L
67/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
51.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55.5 µg/L
67/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.028 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
67/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
147 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
60/65 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.7 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
74.9 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.9 µg/L
57/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54.16 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L
31/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 19/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
438 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00084 mg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2025
Lead
3.5795 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
12/65 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
682.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 728 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
60.41 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
6/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
59.945 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.1 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
0.8975 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9070 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Atrazine
0.1285 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1300 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.6525 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6600 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
0.4000 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.5000 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.0700 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
1.82 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WILLI, JIM
Phone
903-887-7103

Frequently asked questions about East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay

Is East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay serve?

East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay reports serving 6,753 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 96 violations on file for East Cedar Creek Fwsd B a Mckay, of which 68 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.