Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-05-01 → 2008-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-05-01 → 2008-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-05-01 → 2008-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-07-19 → 1979-08-18 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-07-19 → 1980-07-18 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-10 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 975 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 62/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 21.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 40 µg/L No EPA limit set | 54/57 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/57 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 82.8 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 46.5 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 42/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1640 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 9.6 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 24/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 168 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 19.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/8 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 1490 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1450 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3300 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 2/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.4 pCi/L 48% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.01 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.6 pCi/L 31% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chromium | 4.96 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dalapon | 1.4 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/45 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.37 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.7000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Plum Creek
Is Plum Creek tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Plum Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Plum Creek's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Plum Creek serve?
Plum Creek reports serving 7,065 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Plum Creek had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for Plum Creek, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.