← Texas

Tap water quality report

Goforth Sud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 31. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
31
detected
34,893
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hays

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
47
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0051 µg/L 7/12 2024
Pfba 0.0062 µg/L 2/12 2024
PFBS 0.0072 µg/L 2/12 2024
6:2 Fts 0.0156 µg/L 1/12 2024
Pfhxa 0.0041 µg/L 1/12 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
18.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
99/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
98/126 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
70.7 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
98/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
33.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
97/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
95/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
2520 µg/L 194%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
90/95 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.3 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
85/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
84/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
75/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
71/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
2050 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
60/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14.9 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
30/95 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
1940 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2012–2015
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
2930 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
136 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.2 pCi/L 44%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
50 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrite
80 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
3/13 SYR4 2012–2015
Dalapon
1.1 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
2/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
7.6 pCi/L 51%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Lithium
14.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/12 UCMR-5 2024
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.9 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MCDONALD, TRAVIS
Phone
512-376-5695

Frequently asked questions about Goforth Sud

Is Goforth Sud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Goforth Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Goforth Sud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Goforth Sud serve?

Goforth Sud reports serving 34,893 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Goforth Sud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 47 violations on file for Goforth Sud, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.