Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Leigh Wsc-Rural

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
24
detected
6,164
people served
17
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harrison

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
52
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
47.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55 µg/L
46/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
21.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.6 µg/L
45/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
34.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.4 µg/L
45/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
13.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
39/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.5 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 51.7 µg/L
35/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
610.8 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1540 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L
34/37 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
80.855 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 157 µg/L
34/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
33/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
32/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
1770 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1910 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.722 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
20/34 SYR4 2012–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
15/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 8/8 LCR 2023
Fluoride
244.5 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 268 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
57 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
1.72 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
4/37 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
21.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 2/2 SYR4 2012
Nitrate-Nitrite
1361.78 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1430 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014
Xylenes, Total
2.333 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.37 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.2620 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
0.7640 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SHELTON, CARL
Phone
903-927-1075

Frequently asked questions about Leigh Wsc-Rural

Is Leigh Wsc-Rural tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Leigh Wsc-Rural's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Leigh Wsc-Rural's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Leigh Wsc-Rural serve?

Leigh Wsc-Rural reports serving 6,164 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Leigh Wsc-Rural had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 52 violations on file for Leigh Wsc-Rural, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.