Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 356.5 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 480 µg/L | 20/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.74 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L | 17/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 22 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 16/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 41.145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.6 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 31.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 58.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59.4 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 141.35 µg/L 177% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L | 14/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12.635 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 12/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 12/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 30.8 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 14.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 7/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.86 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 5/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 65 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 722.85 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 724 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.4600 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.1 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Cyanide | 6.24 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 12 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
56 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Gill Wsc
Is Gill Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Gill Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Gill Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Gill Wsc serve?
Gill Wsc reports serving 2,640 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Gill Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 74 violations on file for Gill Wsc, of which 55 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.