Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 45/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 45/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 38/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 37/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45.3 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 37/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 35 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 36/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 36/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 133 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 28/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 27/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00050 mg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Atrazine | 0.2400 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 780 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Simazine | 0.1400 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 132 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 170 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 500 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 15.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.6 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Lead | 2 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 2/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Arsenic | 2.7 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.1 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9900 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Harris County Mud 172
Is Harris County Mud 172 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Harris County Mud 172's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Harris County Mud 172's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Harris County Mud 172 serve?
Harris County Mud 172 reports serving 4,404 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Harris County Mud 172 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Harris County Mud 172, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.