← Texas

Tap water quality report

Langham Creek Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 35. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
35
detected
10,377
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-09
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-09
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-13
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-13
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0091 µg/L 3/11 2024
PFBS 0.0037 µg/L 3/11 2024
Pfhxa 0.0063 µg/L 3/11 2024
PFHXS 0.0033 µg/L 3/11 2024
Pfpea 0.0074 µg/L 3/11 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
21.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
117/117 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
28.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
117/117 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
106/117 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
76.9 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.4 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
11.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
91/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1348.1 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
81/86 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
1150 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/117 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
31.8 µg/L 212%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
25/86 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.3400 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
20/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
16/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Simazine
0.1700 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
14/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
620 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2015
Lithium
33.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/11 UCMR-5 2024
Barium
89.8 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
530 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Cyanide
190 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2016
Nitrite
30 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.9 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 SYR4 2016
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.1300 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
2/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.5000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2014–2019
Xylenes, Total
4.3 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2014–2019
74 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NATHANSON, GARY, C
Phone
713-623-4531

Frequently asked questions about Langham Creek Utility District

Is Langham Creek Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 35 contaminants in Langham Creek Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Langham Creek Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Langham Creek Utility District serve?

Langham Creek Utility District reports serving 10,377 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Langham Creek Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Langham Creek Utility District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.