Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-03-11 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 488 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 72/82 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 65/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 41.2 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 60/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 24 µg/L No EPA limit set | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.7 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 53/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 38/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 15 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 32/82 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate | 570 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00080 mg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lithium | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/6 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 570 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 130 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 320 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1200 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.2000 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Cyanide | 60 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 3.1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.1 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision
Is Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision serve?
Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision reports serving 4,578 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 12 violations on file for Sunbelt Fwsd Woodland Oaks Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.