Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 76.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 64/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 37.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 131 µg/L 164% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 60/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 142 µg/L 237% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 58/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 41.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 94 µg/L No EPA limit set | 56/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 271 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 53/62 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 44/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1150 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 7.14 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 12/62 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1140 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Bromoform | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 350 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Barium | 159 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dalapon | 2 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 320 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 2.7 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Atrazine | 0.1400 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.8 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Parkway Utility District
Is Parkway Utility District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Parkway Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Parkway Utility District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Parkway Utility District serve?
Parkway Utility District reports serving 7,323 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Parkway Utility District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Parkway Utility District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.