← Texas

Tap water quality report

Lake Forest Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
21
detected
7,106
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0053 µg/L 4/4 2025
Pfhxa 0.0037 µg/L 3/4 2025
Pfba 0.0052 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
679 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
71/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
39.1 µg/L 261%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
37/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
24/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0127 mg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/18 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
11.6 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
272 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
190 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
680 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
2.9 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.26 pCi/L 25%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Combined Uranium
1.7 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2016
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016
Selenium
3.6 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2016–2019
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
YOUNG, MICHAEL, S
Phone
713-652-6500
Email
ricelufkin@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Lake Forest Utility District

Is Lake Forest Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Lake Forest Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lake Forest Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lake Forest Utility District serve?

Lake Forest Utility District reports serving 7,106 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Lake Forest Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Lake Forest Utility District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.