Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 2390 µg/L 184% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 153/216 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 34.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 104/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 98/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 40.8 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 91/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 90/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.4 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 90/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 85/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 118 µg/L 787% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 64/216 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1750 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 40/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 28/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Atrazine | 0.8600 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 13/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 283 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 650 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1770 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.2700 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 4/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 34.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/8 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Arsenic | 8.4 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.8 pCi/L 56% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.1 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrite | 20 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Bromoform | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 110 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.7800 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.8 pCi/L 32% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.2 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
78 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cnp Utility District
Is Cnp Utility District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Cnp Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cnp Utility District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cnp Utility District serve?
Cnp Utility District reports serving 14,718 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Cnp Utility District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Cnp Utility District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.