Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Jersey Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 34. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
34
detected
7,792
people served
12
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
45
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Unaddressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Unaddressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1998-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1998-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1998-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-01-01 → 1998-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0309 µg/L 5/12 2023
Pfhxa 0.0073 µg/L 5/12 2023
Pfpea 0.0077 µg/L 5/12 2023
PFHXS 0.0035 µg/L 2/12 2023
PFBS 0.0037 µg/L 1/12 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 70/77 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 64/77 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 56/77 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.9 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 55/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.6 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 53/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1170 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 46/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 46/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
868 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 44/64 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 34/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
11 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 29/64 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 19/77 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2024
Atrazine
0.4300 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
 10/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
31.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/12 UCMR-5 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
820 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2015
Arsenic
9.8 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 8/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.1800 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
 8/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
189 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
730 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
9.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 4/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
1.1 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
13.7 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5 pCi/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Nitrite
20 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 3/9 SYR4 2012–2015
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.9300 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 2/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
4.1 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 2/6 SYR4 2012–2019
75 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SINGLETON, JAMES
Phone
713-466-2100
Email
jsingleton@jerseyvillagetx.com

Frequently asked questions about City of Jersey Village

Is City of Jersey Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 34 contaminants in City of Jersey Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Jersey Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Jersey Village serve?

City of Jersey Village reports serving 7,792 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Jersey Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 45 violations on file for City of Jersey Village, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.