Is Ebeling Wsc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Hale

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Unaddressed	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Unaddressed	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Unaddressed	2024-10-17
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	7840 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 8230 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	6154 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 6370 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2012–2015
Copper	157 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 160 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2016
Chloroform	1.512 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.57 µg/L	5/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	4.4315 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.88 µg/L	4/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	1.17 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2013–2016
Arsenic	3.606 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 3.64 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	69.46 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 70 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Chromium	3.098 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	2666 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 2670 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	10.47 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.5 pCi/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	9.06 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Combined Uranium	10.575 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.625 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	5.9 pCi/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 6 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
TTHM	4.7305 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 4.88 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	2.68 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate	0.9000 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L	1/7	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	0.0054 mg/L 36% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	1/1	LCR	2023
Trichloroacetic Acid	1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019

59 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: MILLER, RONALD, G
Phone: 806-441-8714
Email: RONANDMEL1@SUDDENLINK.NET

Frequently asked questions about Ebeling Wsc

Is Ebeling Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Ebeling Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ebeling Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Chloroform, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ebeling Wsc serve?

Ebeling Wsc reports serving 51 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Ebeling Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 70 violations on file for Ebeling Wsc, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.