Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dibromochloromethane | 28.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 123/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 37.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 117/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 142 µg/L 178% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 116/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2310 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 112/112 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 107/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 114 µg/L 190% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 107/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 84.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 106/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 96.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 102/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set | 93/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 658 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 82/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 75/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 41 µg/L 273% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 39/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 23/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2430 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 20/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0016 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 45.8 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 240 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Dalapon | 1.6 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.8600 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 120 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 2/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.1 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 3.2 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Crystal Clear Sud
Is Crystal Clear Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Crystal Clear Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Crystal Clear Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Nitrate, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Crystal Clear Sud serve?
Crystal Clear Sud reports serving 20,766 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Crystal Clear Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 403 violations on file for Crystal Clear Sud, of which 192 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.