← Texas

Tap water quality report

Elderville Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
25
detected
9,021
people served
26
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Gregg

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

26
health-based violations
122
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
72.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 91.6 µg/L
84/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.3 µg/L
83/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.79 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
36.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.5 µg/L
69/70 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
83.54 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 115 µg/L
69/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.4 µg/L
68/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
535.75 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 601 µg/L
66/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L
62/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
43/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
84.32 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
30/48 SYR4 2013–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
28/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
25/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
642 µg/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 683 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2012–2015
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
10/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.516 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.66 µg/L
9/48 SYR4 2013–2018
Barium
56.21 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
831.75 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 898 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrite
146.8 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 172 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2012–2015
Arsenic
1.0835 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
29.66 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
21.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/8 UCMR-5 2025
Chromium
0.4400 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.5700 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/11 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
1.7 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SNOODY, MELVIN
Phone
903-452-8200
Email
WMCCARROLL@DOW.COM

Frequently asked questions about Elderville Wsc

Is Elderville Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Elderville Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Elderville Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Elderville Wsc serve?

Elderville Wsc reports serving 9,021 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Elderville Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 122 violations on file for Elderville Wsc, of which 26 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.