Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 207.65 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 162/186 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 43 µg/L 287% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L | 73/186 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 65/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 65/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.597 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 64/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 120.2 µg/L 150% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 141 µg/L | 57/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 53.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67.5 µg/L | 56/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 90.925 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 99 µg/L | 56/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.6 µg/L | 56/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L | 37/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2026 |
| Nitrate | 163 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 17/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 52.56 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.8 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cyanide | 230.4 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 276 µg/L | 7/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 58.36 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.7 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Gladewater
Is City of Gladewater tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in City of Gladewater's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Gladewater's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Gladewater serve?
City of Gladewater reports serving 6,441 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Gladewater had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 382 violations on file for City of Gladewater, of which 187 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.