Is Two Way Sud Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Grayson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
6:2 Fts	0.0971 µg/L	1/11	2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	57.5 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 70 µg/L	84/96	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	140 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 330 µg/L	51/51	SYR4	2013–2017
Bromoform	10.059 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L	44/45	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.6135 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3 µg/L	24/45	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	54.6 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 57 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	501.6 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 510 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	13/13	LCR	2025
Chromium	4.62 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L	12/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	55.7 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 70 µg/L	12/18	SYR4	2012–2015
TTHM	15.185 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Lithium	38.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	12/12	UCMR-5	2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	3.38 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L	9/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	2.67 pCi/L 53% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L	8/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.785 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	8/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	3.62 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L	5/51	SYR4	2013–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	2.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	3/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	2.8 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	1/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride	0.5100 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/33	SYR4	2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	3.3 pCi/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L	1/7	SYR4	2016–2019
Selenium	15 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L	1/13	SYR4	2013–2019

88 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneChloroformCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: PATTERSON, JERRY
Phone: 903-564-3180

Frequently asked questions about Two Way Sud

Is Two Way Sud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Two Way Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Two Way Sud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Two Way Sud serve?

Two Way Sud reports serving 6,804 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Two Way Sud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Two Way Sud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.