← Texas

Tap water quality report

Windsong Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
15
detected
78
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Galveston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
95
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-02-08
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-02-08
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-02-08
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-02-08
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1231.6 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4210 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
110 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.835 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.85 µg/L
7/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.955 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
269.1 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1568 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1570 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
118 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Nitrite
20 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2018
TTHM
1.95 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.24 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.6000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.4 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00060 mg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 2024
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ROBB, DAVID
Phone
713-824-4258
Email
drobb@specializedms.com

Frequently asked questions about Windsong Park

Is Windsong Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Windsong Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Windsong Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Chloroform, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Windsong Park serve?

Windsong Park reports serving 78 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Windsong Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 95 violations on file for Windsong Park, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.