← Texas

Tap water quality report

Sienna Mud 3

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
18
detected
7,365
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fort Bend

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0230 µg/L 2/2 2023
Pfpea 0.1300 µg/L 2/2 2023
PFBS 0.0032 µg/L 1/2 2023
Pfhxa 0.0047 µg/L 1/2 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
482 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 507 µg/L
41/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00050 mg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
19.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
38.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
61.36 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
36.64 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
21.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
6/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 UCMR-5 2023
26 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
TRULL, DON
Phone
713-860-6400

Frequently asked questions about Sienna Mud 3

Is Sienna Mud 3 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Sienna Mud 3's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sienna Mud 3's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sienna Mud 3 serve?

Sienna Mud 3 reports serving 7,365 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Sienna Mud 3 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Sienna Mud 3, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.