← Texas

Tap water quality report

Dial Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
19
detected
285
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fannin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
21
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1984-12-18 → 1985-12-17
MCL Health-based Archived 1980-04-07 → 1980-05-06
MCL Health-based Archived 1980-04-07 → 1981-04-06
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-19
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-03-01 → 2007-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-03-01 → 2007-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
89.5 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
222 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
6.086 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.62 µg/L
7/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.214 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.85 µg/L
7/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2023
Fluoride
3244 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3290 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.18 µg/L
4/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.6625 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6700 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.299 pCi/L 46%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.3 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
88.15 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Barium
36.95 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chromium
7.93 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
12.34 pCi/L 82%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 12.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
2.715 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
12.893 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.285 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
1.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SPRUCE, HENRY, A
Email
dialwsc1964@yahoo.com

Frequently asked questions about Dial Wsc

Is Dial Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Dial Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dial Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dial Wsc serve?

Dial Wsc reports serving 285 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Dial Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Dial Wsc, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.