← Texas

Tap water quality report

Multi-County Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
17
detected
3,631
people served
205
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Coryell

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

205
health-based violations
227
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0154 µg/L 3/4 2023
Pfhxa 0.0038 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfpea 0.0046 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
79.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
77.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
92.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
302 µg/L 378%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
55/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
78.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
51/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
86.2 µg/L 144%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
31/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
56.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
26.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
250 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
19/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
18/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0024 mg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
9/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/55 SYR4 2012–2019
27 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
MATTHEWS, KYLE
Phone
254-865-2269

Frequently asked questions about Multi-County Wsc

Is Multi-County Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Multi-County Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Multi-County Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Multi-County Wsc serve?

Multi-County Wsc reports serving 3,631 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Multi-County Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 227 violations on file for Multi-County Wsc, of which 205 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.