Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorite | 860 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 218/225 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 49.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 79/79 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 94.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 78/79 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 78/79 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 176 µg/L 220% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 71/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 140 µg/L 233% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 70/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 71.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 69/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 11.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 68/79 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 43.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1000 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 62/65 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 7 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 25/65 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 810 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 17/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 240 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 72.5 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.2800 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 130 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.2550 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.8410 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 2.03 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dalapon | 2 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.5 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Gatesville
Is City of Gatesville tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in City of Gatesville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Gatesville's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Gatesville serve?
City of Gatesville reports serving 16,135 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Gatesville had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 54 violations on file for City of Gatesville, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.