Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Era Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
18
detected
462
people served
10
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cooke

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
105
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-07-01 → 1992-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
114 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 5/5 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
2.348 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.45 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
3.2095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.52 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.7035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.72 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
151.8 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
89.94 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
7.434 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.69 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
4.19 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chromium
3.445 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.475 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.3 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
24.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
0.8600 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromoform
1.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
REITER, TODD
Phone
940-736-1162

Frequently asked questions about Era Wsc

Is Era Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Era Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Era Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Era Wsc serve?

Era Wsc reports serving 462 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Era Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 105 violations on file for Era Wsc, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.