Is Eola Wsc Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Concho

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

601

health-based violations

1,395

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	44800 µg/L 448% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 45500 µg/L	66/66	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	36950 µg/L 370% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 37700 µg/L	11/11	SYR4	2012–2015
Lead	0.00070 mg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	7/7	LCR	2009
Bromoform	13.625 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L	6/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Arsenic	4.86 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2016–2019
Barium	87.92 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 88 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2016–2019
Fluoride	358.5 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 362 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	17.39 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 18.1 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2016–2019
Copper	10.775 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 11 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2017
Chromium	3.52 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.55 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	2/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Lead	2.045 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2017
Xylenes, Total	2.138 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L	2/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	2.1 pCi/L 42% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2014
Combined Uranium	2.5 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2014
Dibromoacetic Acid	4.6 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Ethylbenzene	0.7000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L	1/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	4 pCi/L No EPA limit set	1/1	SYR4	2014
TTHM	17.1 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	4.6 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019

59 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: DOROTIK, REBECCA
Phone: 325-456-5905
Email: eulawsc@taylortel.net

Frequently asked questions about Eola Wsc

Is Eola Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Eola Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Eola Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Bromoform, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Eola Wsc serve?

Eola Wsc reports serving 165 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Eola Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1395 violations on file for Eola Wsc, of which 601 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 87 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.