Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 2400 µg/L 185% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 109/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.39 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 22/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 32.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 42.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 28.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 108 µg/L 135% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.7 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 17/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 4/4 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision
Is Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision serve?
Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision reports serving 2,322 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Gbra Johnson Ranch Subdivision, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.