Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2026-01-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0064 µg/L | 4/7 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 717 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1190 µg/L | 63/74 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 35.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.9 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 37.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.6 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 22.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 46.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.5 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 31.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.8 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 130.2 µg/L 163% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 156 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 57.18 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.8 µg/L | 55/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 51.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.7 µg/L | 51/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.244 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 48/74 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0029 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 11.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 7/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 9.59 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Coleman County Sud
Is Coleman County Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Coleman County Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Coleman County Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Coleman County Sud serve?
Coleman County Sud reports serving 5,000 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Coleman County Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 258 violations on file for Coleman County Sud, of which 131 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 23 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.